Get in touch

We Tracked 200 Queries Across Google and ChatGPT for 90 Days — Here's Where They Disagreed

Google and ChatGPT for 90 Days · · By Monika Gupta
We Tracked 200 Queries Across Google and ChatGPT for 90 Days — Here's Where They Disagreed

We wanted a straight answer to a question clients keep asking us: "If I rank well on Google, am I safe?" So we picked 200 real queries across client accounts — a mix of commercial and informational intent — and manually checked both Google's top 10 and ChatGPT's answer every week for three months. 

The overlap was lower than we expected. In roughly 38% of queries, the top-ranking Google page's brand was never mentioned in ChatGPT's answer to the same question. Informational queries ("how does X work," "what is Y") had the widest gap — ChatGPT tended to synthesize an answer from Wikipedia-style sources and forums rather than brand content, even when that brand ranked #1 on Google. 

Commercial queries ("best X for Y," "X vs Z") had much tighter overlap — around 80% — because comparison-style content tends to get lifted directly into AI answers. 

The takeaway we've since built into every content brief: informational content needs a distinct AEO pass (clear definitions, structured facts) separate from the SEO pass, because ranking well in one doesn't guarantee visibility in the other.

How we ran the tracking

The method was deliberately simple so any team can repeat it:

  • Query selection: real queries taken from client Search Console accounts, split between informational ("what is", "how does") and commercial ("best", "vs", "alternatives") intent.
  • Weekly checks: for each query we recorded the brands in Google's top 10 organic results and the brands named in ChatGPT's answer.
  • Clean sessions: ChatGPT checks were run in fresh, logged-out sessions where possible so personal history didn't shape the answers.
  • Overlap measure: a query counted as "overlapping" when the brand behind the top-ranking Google page was also mentioned in the ChatGPT answer.

Why informational queries showed the biggest gap

For a question like "what is crawl budget", there are hundreds of pages giving similar explanations. An AI model can produce a good answer without naming any single source, and when it does cite sources it often prefers encyclopaedia-style pages, documentation and community discussions. A brand's blog post can rank first on Google because of strong links and relevance, yet offer nothing distinctive enough to be named in a summarised answer.

Why commercial queries overlapped more

Comparison and "best of" queries require naming specific products and companies. The answer can't be written without brands. Pages that already list and compare options in a structured way, with clear pros, cons and use cases, give AI tools ready-made material, so the same brands tend to appear in both places.

What we now add to every brief: the AEO pass

After the usual SEO checks, every informational article gets a second pass focused on being quotable:

  1. A one- or two-sentence definition or direct answer near the top.
  2. Specific facts, numbers or steps that are clearly attributed to the brand's own experience or data.
  3. Question-style subheadings that match how people phrase prompts.
  4. A short summary or key takeaways block.
  5. Clear author information and an updated date.

Our guide to citation-ready content goes into each of these.

Limitations of this kind of study

AI answers change between sessions, users and model versions, so any snapshot is approximate. Our queries came from client accounts, which skews towards the industries we work in, and ChatGPT results may differ from Perplexity, Gemini or Google's AI Mode. Treat the numbers as directional, not as a universal benchmark.

How to run this on your own site

  1. Export your top 50 queries from Search Console and tag each one as informational or commercial.
  2. For each query, note whether your brand ranks in Google's top 10 and whether it appears in ChatGPT's answer.
  3. Repeat weekly for at least a month.
  4. Prioritise queries where you rank well on Google but are missing from AI answers. These are the quickest AEO wins.

Read More : Stop Optimizing for Position #1. Optimize to Be the Answer Instead.

Need a hand with this? Our generative engine optimization (GEO) team can help you put it into practice. Talk to ClicZeo.

Related reading

Frequently asked

No — our tracking showed this holds true only about 62% of the time, and much less often for purely informational queries.

Commercial comparison queries ("best X," "X vs Y") had the highest overlap in our data.

Monthly is reasonable for most sites; weekly if you're actively publishing AEO-focused content and want to measure impact.

Monika Gupta

Digital Marketring Executive

ClicZeo Editorial Team is a team of digital marketing professionals specializing in SEO, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), GEO, Google Ads, Meta Ads, content marketing, and local business growth. We create data-driven content to help businesses improve their online visibility, generate qualified leads, and stay ahead of the latest digital marketing trends.

See How AI Search Describes Your Brand Today

We run your domain through the same visibility checks we use on client accounts — AI answer coverage, technical SEO and content gaps — and send you the findings. No obligation.